The expansion marks a sharp shift in the way investors are using blockchain networks. Instead of relying mainly on native crypto assets such as Bitcoin, Ether or governance tokens, institutions are increasingly placing government securities, private credit, commodities, funds and other income-generating instruments on programmable ledgers. The appeal lies in faster settlement, round-the-clock transferability, lower operational friction and the ability to use tokenised instruments as collateral inside digital-asset markets.
The strongest growth has come from tokenised US Treasuries and money-market products, which have become a preferred parking place for crypto-native firms, stablecoin issuers and institutional investors seeking yield without moving fully out of blockchain-based systems. The category has expanded from a niche experiment into a multibillion-dollar market led by products associated with BlackRock, Circle, Franklin Templeton, Ondo Finance and other specialist issuers.
BlackRock’s BUIDL fund, managed through Securitize, remains among the most closely watched products in the segment. Circle’s USYC, Franklin Templeton’s BENJI, Ondo’s OUSG and USDY, and newer structures from asset managers and digital-finance platforms have broadened the market beyond a single issuer. Several funds are backed by short-term government debt, repurchase agreements or money-market instruments, giving investors a bridge between blockchain settlement and traditional fixed-income returns.
Private credit has also become a major part of the tokenisation story. On-chain credit platforms have directed capital into loans backed by business receivables, structured credit, trade finance and asset-based lending. While the private credit segment is smaller than its traditional global counterpart, which runs into trillions of dollars, blockchain-based issuance has attracted investors looking for diversification, higher yields and transparent reporting of loan pools.
Commodities have added another layer of momentum. Gold-backed tokens, led by established products such as Tether Gold and Pax Gold, have drawn interest as bullion prices strengthened and investors looked for assets that could be traded instantly without the logistics of physical custody. Tokenised gold trading volumes rose strongly through 2025 and into the first quarter of 2026, showing that the market is no longer limited to Treasury bills and credit funds.
The rise of tokenised real-world assets has contrasted with a choppier environment for broader crypto. Bitcoin suffered heavy losses earlier in 2026 before recovering part of the decline, while Ether and several smaller tokens remained under pressure from lower liquidity, weaker retail participation and shifting expectations over US interest rates. The global crypto market lost substantial value from its 2025 peak, reinforcing the divide between speculative tokens and blockchain products tied to identifiable cash flows or collateral.
Regulation remains the central constraint. Tokenised assets sit at the intersection of securities law, custody rules, anti-money-laundering requirements and cross-border transfer restrictions. Issuers must prove that token holders have enforceable rights to the underlying asset, that reserves are properly segregated, and that secondary trading complies with investor eligibility rules. These concerns explain why many institutional products remain available only to qualified investors rather than the general public.
Hong Kong, Singapore, Abu Dhabi, Switzerland, the United States and the European Union are competing to shape the next stage of tokenisation. Abu Dhabi has supported tokenised fund structures through its financial centre, while Hong Kong has positioned itself as a digital-asset hub even as mainland regulators have taken a more cautious stance. The EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets framework and pilot regimes for distributed-ledger market infrastructure are giving firms clearer pathways, although implementation remains uneven.
Topics
Cryptocurrency